Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal

Vol-04, Issue-1 (Jan-Mar 2026)

An International scholarly/ academic journal, peer-reviewed/ refereed journal, ISSN : 2960-0006

Energy Diversification: Determinant of Environment Sustainability, Economic Growth and Climate Change in Oyo State

Adeyemi, Motunrayo Iyabode1 and Bolaji, Olufemi Akinloye2

1Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo

2Emmanuel Alayande University of Education, Oyos

Abstract

The study investigated the influence of energy diversification on environment sustainability and economic growth in Oyo state. A survey research design was used in the study. The Energy Diversification on Environment Sustainability and Economic Growth Rating Scale (EDESEG) was the research tool modified for the study. 181 depressed people from different economic sectors in Nigeria make up the study’s sample. The reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha, and the coefficient was r=0.83. For the study, the purposive sampling approach was used. ANCOVA was used to examine the data. Three hypotheses were proposed and examined at the significance level of 0.05. The outcome showed significant main effect of energy diversification on environment sustainability (F (2, 23) = 52.171; p>0.05, partial η2 = .228). Also, it was revealed that energy diversification was significantly predict economic growth (F (1, 24) = .705.; p<0.05, partial η2 = .004. Consequently, the study revealed that energy diversification in predict climate change (F (2, 23) = 32.546; p>0.05, partial η2 = .155). However, it was concluded that energy security and the long-term transition to sustainability depend heavily on energy diversity, and recommendations were made in the end.

Keywords: Energy Diversification, Renewable energy, Economic Growth, Environment

About Author

Adeyemi, Motunrayo Iyabode

Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo, Nigeria. Research Focus: A seasoned academician and researcher, Motunrayo Iyabode Adeyemi specializes in Integrated Science Education and Biochemistry. Her work frequently explores the intersection of scientific literacy, environmental sustainability, and public health. She is particularly noted for her research on how educational frameworks and biochemical factors influence societal development in South-West Nigeria.

Bolaji, Olufemi Akinloye

 

Emmanuel Alayande University of Education, Oyo, Nigeria. Research Focus: Olufemi Akinloye Bolaji is a prominent researcher in Science Education and Pedagogical Innovation. With an h-index of 6 and nearly 200 citations, his expertise spans the impact of socio-demographic variables on academic engagement and the role of technology in teacher education. His contribution to this article reflects his broader interest in how scientific education and policy-driven resource management can solve real-world economic and environmental challenges.

Impact Statement

This research provides a localized blueprint for sustainable development in Oyo State, Nigeria, by examining the nexus between energy policy and environmental health. The study demonstrates that transitioning from traditional biomass and heavy petroleum reliance toward a diversified energy mix is not merely an environmental necessity but a primary driver for regional economic stability.

By analyzing specific climate variables in Oyo State, the findings offer actionable insights for regional policymakers to:

  • Mitigate Carbon Emissions: Reducing the ecological footprint of the state’s growing industrial and domestic sectors.
  • Enhance Energy Security: Lowering vulnerability to fossil fuel price volatility through local renewable integration.
  • Drive Inclusive Growth: Identifying how modern energy access empowers local commerce and improves public health outcomes.

 

Citation

APA 7th Style 

Adeyemi, M. I., & Bolaji, O. A. (2026). Energy diversification: Determinant of environment sustainability, economic growth and climate change in Oyo State. Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(01), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/9182

Chicago 17th Style 

Adeyemi, Motunrayo Iyabode, and Olufemi Akinloye Bolaji. “Energy Diversification: Determinant of Environment Sustainability, Economic Growth and Climate Change in Oyo State.” Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal 4, no. 1 (2026): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/9182.

MLA 9th Style 

Adeyemi, Motunrayo Iyabode and Bolaji, Olufemi Akinloye. “Energy Diversification: Determinant of Environment Sustainability, Economic Growth and Climate Change in Oyo State.” Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, 2026, pp. 109-117, https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/9182.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/9182 

Page Numbers: 109–117 

Subject: Environmental Economics / Energy Studies

Received: October 28, 2025 

Accepted: December 02, 2025 

Published: January 01, 2026

Thematic Classification: Energy Diversification, Environmental Sustainability, Economic Growth Determinants, Climate Change Mitigation, Regional Resource Management.

Introduction

Energy is a catalyst that enhanced the sustainability of any means of production in the global economic outfit. Energy plays pivotal roles in the operation of mechanical machines, solar panels and robotic hard ware used for production in industries, farms banking industries and education sector (Gozgor & Paramati, 2022). Energy be it kinetic, mechanical, potential and electrical energy as the case maybe aid economic growth. Ekeh, Okemiri., Uche-Nwachi & Ekeh. (2021) stress that no meaningful development can be realized in a situation where adequate energy is not provided for the means of production. Nigeria as a country face many challenges in economy, political and governance due to non-diversification of her sources of energy (Gorb, Rębilas, Aranchiy, Yasnolob, Boiko & Padalka, 2020). Many sectors have been jeopardized from the fact that government does not provide enabling environment for the industrialists to operate in term of energy usage (Rubio-Varas & Muñoz-Delgado, 2019). 

Generally, insufficient dynamism affects our economic system in Nigeria, in Africa production system is affected because African leaders focuses more on petroleum to power her industrial equipment neglecting others energy source which in turn affect her economic growth and environmental sustainability (Muller and Yan 2018). Gorb, Rębilas, Aranchiy, Yasnolob, Boiko & Padalka, (2020) stress that environmental sustainability can be realized when energy is diversified to supply productive equipment that are used to explore natural resources that enhance nation wealth. 

Ekeh, Okemiri, Uche-Nwachi & Ekeh (2021) points it out that single source of energy narrow global development, affect security out fits and paralyze the effectiveness of good governance. The fact still remains that through energy diversification, our institutions of higher learning can compete with the others in the area of research that enhance creativities and critical thinking (Rubio-Varas & Muñoz-Delgado, 2019). Energy diversification has not received adequate attention in Nigeria to the extent that our curriculum structure in the Universities, Polytechnics and Institutions of education in Nigeria affected.  Some of the equipment in the laboratories, teaching hospitals, workshops and some other gadgets that need to be power by energy were not fully utilize due to inadequate electricity.   

The fact that Nigeria embraces one source of energy resulted in natural disaster accomplished by climate change. Climate change is global warming emanate as a result of concentration or release of harmful gases into the atmosphere (Harrington, Athavankar, & Hsu, 2020). The emission of methane (CH4), carbon (iv) oxide (CO2), ozone (O3), nitrous oxide (N2O) from petrol damages the health of many Nigerians. However, if energy can be diversified there will be a reduction in the gasses emitted that endanger human to this end, this study examined energy divergence as a determinant of environmental sustainability and growth in Oyo state’s economy.

Statement of the Problem

The warming of the earth’s atmosphere is alarming and it’s as a result of the increase in the concentration of the one or more greenhouse gases released from the use of non-renewable energy which poses danger to human through high temperature and extreme weather conditions, death, diseases, flooding, desertification, acidic downpour and making life difficult to live.  There is no development in the economy sector simply because our energy sector is not diversified. The environment can no more sustained us due to the effect of global warming. Low productivity had been witnessing in our agricultural sector. There is incessant increase in dollar against naira simply because our energy is not enough to support our production. This study however wants to examine energy diversification and its effects on the economic growth and environment sustainability in Nigeria. 

Purpose of the study

 The main purpose of the study is to examine energy diversification and its effects on the economic growth and environment sustainability Nigeria. 

Hypotheses

H01: Environment sustainability is not being significant influenced by energy diversification. 

H02: Economic growth is not being significant influenced by energy diversification. 

H03: Climate change is not being significant influenced by energy diversification.

Methodology

The research investigated the influence of energy diversification on environment sustainability and economic growth in Oyo state. A survey research design was used in the study. The Energy Diversification on Environment Sustainability and Economic Growth Rating Scale (EDESEG) was the research tool modified for the study. 181 depressed people from different economic sectors in Nigeria made up the study’s sample. For the study, the purposive sampling approach was used. ANCOVA was used to examine the data.

Results

H01: Environment sustainability is not being significant influenced by energy diversification. 

Table 1

ANCOVA showing main effect of Energy Diversification on Environment Sustainability and Economic Growth in Oyo State

Source            Type III Sum of           df          Mean Square            F                   p                partial η2

                         Squares                                                                                                                   

Corrected               3.546a                                   3                     1.182            23.618                  .000             .288

Model 

Intercept                7.810                         1                7.810          156.082                  .000           .469

Environmental       2.611                        1                 2.611            52.171                  .000          .228

Sustainability                 

Economic Growth    .035                       1                   .035                .705                    .402         .004

Climate                   1.629                       1                 1.629             32. 546                  .000          .155                  

Error                       8.857                     177                .050

Total                     322.000                   181

Corrected Total     12.403                    180

R Squared = .286 (Adjusted R Squared = .274)

  

Table 1 revealed significant main effect of energy diversification on environment sustainability (F (2,23) = 52.171, partial η2 = .228). This showed the effect magnitude of 03.2%. This indicated 03.2% of the total 27% variation observed (Adjusted R2 = .274) on environment sustainability post-treatment scores in Oyo State. This ANCOVA model resulted from the treatment’s noteworthy primary impact. Hypothesis 1 was so approved.  It means that energy diversification does not necessarily predict environment sustainability. 

H02: Economic growth is not being significant influenced by energy diversification.

Table 2: ANCOVA showing main effect of Energy Diversification on Economic Growth in Oyo State

Source            Type III Sum of           df          Mean Square            F                   p                partial η2

                         Squares                                                                                                                      

                                                                                                                                                          Squared

Corrected               3.546a                                   3                     1.182            23.618                  .000             .288

Model 

Intercept                7.810                         1                7.810          156.082                  .000           .469

Environmental       2.611                        1                 2.611            52.171                  .000          .228

Sustainability                 

Economic Growth    .035                       1                   .035                .705                    .402         .004

Climate                   1.629                       1                 1.629             32. 546                  .000          .155                  

Error                       8.857                     177                .050

Total                     322.000                   181

Corrected Total     12.403                    180

R Squared = .286 (Adjusted R Squared = .274)

In hypothesis 2, it was revealed that energy diversification was significantly predict economic growth in Oyo State (F (1, 24) = .705.; p<0.05, partial η2 = .004). Hypothesis 2 was not therefore upheld. This means that energy diversification was significantly predict economic growth.

 H03: Climate change is not being significant influenced by energy diversification.

Table 3

ANCOVA showing main effect of Energy Diversification on Climate Change in Oyo State

Source            Type III Sum of           df          Mean Square            F                   p                partial η2

                         Squares                                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                                                          Squared

Corrected               3.546a                                   3                     1.182            23.618                  .000             .288

Model 

Intercept                7.810                         1                7.810          156.082                  .000           .469

Environmental       2.611                        1                 2.611            52.171                  .000          .228

Sustainability                 

Economic Growth    .035                       1                   .035                .705                    .402         .004

Climate                   1.629                       1                 1.629             32. 546                  .000          .155                  

Error                       8.857                     177                .050

Total                     322.000                   181

Corrected Total     12.403                    180

R Squared = .286 (Adjusted R Squared = .274)

 

Hypothesis 3, shown significant main effect of energy diversification in predict climate change in Oyo State (F (2, 23) = 32.546; p>0.05, partial η2 = .155). Thus, hypothesis 3 was rejected. This indicates energy diversification was significantly predict climate change.

Discussion of Findings

The outcome of the study exposed significant energy diversification in Nigeria. The outcome points out that energy diversification does not necessarily predict environment sustainability in Oyo State this contradict the finding of Gozgor & Paramati, (2022) who energy as a component that enhance economic advancement. 

Also, the study revealed that energy diversification was significantly predict economic growth. This is in line with the finding of Rubio-Varas and Muñoz-Delgado, (2019) they emphasized that energy variation ensure environmental security. This also corroborate the finding of Lee and Lee (2019) who says that energy diversification improved production that can improved standard of living.

This study also revealed effect of energy diversification in predict climate change. This is in agreement of the finding of Akrofi, (2021) who is in his finding energy diversification reduce the effect of climate changes. This also supported by the finding of Ma, Zhang & Ji (2021) that energy diversification boosts the production of industrial sectors, this also is in line with the finding of Bofinger, Heyden & Rock (2022); Wang, Ma, Dong & Zhang (2023) and Ozkan, Temiz &Yildiz (2023) that says that energy diversification promotes economic growth and environmental sustainability.

Conclusion

Energy security and long-term sustainability transitions are significantly aided by energy diversification. Africa can boost its energy access rates, enhance energy security, and promote environmental sustainability by diversifying its energy sources and utilizing its abundant renewable energy resources. However, the continent has paid little attention to the topic of energy diversification.

Recommendations

Cut down on greenhouse gas emissions: The main cause of greenhouse gas emissions that fuel climate change is fossil fuels.

Reduced greenhouse gas emissions and a complete reliance on fossil fuels can be achieved by diversifying the energy mix with renewable sources.

Enhance the quality of the air and water: Burning fossil fuels releases pollutants into the air and water that are bad for the ecosystem and human health. Cleaner air and water are the result of renewable energy sources producing little or no pollution.

Frameworks for regulations and policies are essential for encouraging renewable energy diversification.

Governments must foster an atmosphere that supports investment in a range of renewable energy sources. The development and implementation of diverse renewable technologies can be encouraged by supportive policies like feed-in tariffs, tax breaks, and renewable portfolio standards. To cut emissions, several governments combine effective regulations with renewable resources in ingenious ways.

Statements and Declarations

Peer-Review Method: This article underwent a double-blind peer-review process by two independent external experts in Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development. This ensures the technical accuracy of the energy diversification models and the validity of the regional climate impact assessments.

Competing Interests: The authors (Motunrayo Iyabode Adeyemi and Olufemi Akinloye Bolaji) declare no financial or personal conflicts of interest that could have influenced the research, data analysis, or findings presented in this study.

Funding: This research was conducted as an independent scholarly project. No specific grants or financial support were received from public, commercial, or non-profit funding agencies for this work.

Data Availability: The data supporting the findings of this study on energy diversification in Oyo State are derived from regional economic surveys and environmental reports. Relevant datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Licence: Energy Diversification: Determinant of Environment Sustainability, Economic Growth and Climate Change in Oyo State © 2026 by Adeyemi, M. I. and Bolaji, O. A. is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. This work is published by the International Council for Education Research and Training (ICERT).

Ethics Approval: This research involves the analysis of economic and environmental determinants. As it did not involve experiments on human participants or animal subjects, it was granted an exemption from formal ethical review by the Research Ethics Committees of the Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo, and Emmanuel Alayande University of Education, Oyo.

References
  1. Akrofi, M. M. (2021). An analysis of energy diversification and transition trends in Africa. International Journal of Energy and Water Resources, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-020-00101-5

  2. Azzuni, A., & Breyer, C. (2020). Global energy security index and its application on national level. Energies, 13(10), 2502. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102502

  3. Bofinger, Y., Heyden, K. J., & Rock, B. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and market efficiency: Evidence from ESG and misevaluation measures. Journal of Banking and Finance, 134, Article 106322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106322

  4. Ekeh, G. E., Okemiri, H. A., Uche-Nwachi, E. O., & Ekeh, L. K. (2021). Science-systems as a catalyst to sustainable national security in Nigeria. Science World Journal, 16(4), 397–401.

  5. Gorb, O., Rębilas, R., Aranchiy, V., Yasnolob, I., Boiko, S., & Padalka, V. (2020). Strengthening competitiveness of the national economy by enhancing energy efficiency and diversifying energy supply sources in rural areas. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 11(5), 1114–1123. https://doi.org/10.14505//JEMT.V11.5(45).09

  6. Gozgor, G., & Paramati, S. R. (2022). Does energy diversification cause an economic slowdown? Evidence from a newly constructed energy diversification index. Energy Economics, 109, Article 105970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105970

  7. Harrington, E., Athavankar, A., & Hsu, D. (2020). Variation in rural household energy transitions for basic lighting in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, Article 109568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109568

  8. Lee, C.-C., & Lee, C.-C. (2019). Oil price shocks and Chinese banking performance: Do country risks matter? Energy Economics, 77, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.010

  9. Ganapathy, V. (2024b). Decentralized identity verification in metaverse auditing using blockchain technology. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 03(03), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7719

  10. Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., & Ji, Q. (2021). Do oil shocks affect Chinese bank risk? Energy Economics, 96, Article 105166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105166

  11. Matallah, S. (2020). Economic diversification in MENA oil exporters: Understanding the role of governance. Resources Policy, 66, Article 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101602

  12. Dangar, H. N. (2025). E-Learning Technology and its Impact on mass Education: Opportunities and challenges. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 04(01), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7786

  13. AbdulRafiu, A., Makinde, S. O., Mohammed, A., & Sakariyahu, S. (2025). Innovative Strategies for Enhancing Entrepreneurial Skills of Business Education Students for Sustainable Development. Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 03(01), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/9097

  14. Muller, C., & Yan, H. (2018). Household fuel use in developing countries: Review of theory and evidence. Energy Economics, 70, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.024

  15. Ozkan, A., Temiz, H., & Yildiz, Y. (2023). Climate risk, corporate social responsibility, and firm Performance. British Journal of Management, 34(4), 1791–1810. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12665

  16. Pueyo, A. (2018). What constrains renewable energy investment in sub-Saharan Africa? A comparison of Kenya and Ghana. World Development, 109, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2018.04.008

  17. Rubio-Varas, M., & Muñoz-Delgado, B. (2019a). Long-term diversification paths and energy transitions in Europe. Ecological Economics, 163(158), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.025

  18. Wang, J. M., Dong, M., T., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Do ESG ratings promote corporate green innovation? A quasi-natural experiment based on SynTao green Finance’s ESG ratings. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, Article 102623

Scroll to Top