Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal
Vol-04, Issue-03(Jul-Sep 2025)
An International scholarly/ academic journal, peer-reviewed/ refereed journal, ISSN : 2959-1376
Buddhist Philosophy, Scientific Inquiry, and the Ethics of AI in Literature
Bodi, Padmasri1 and Raghu Ram, Koduru Sree2
1Assistant Professor in English, Vasireddy Venkatadri Institute of Technology, Nambur, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
2Assistant Professor, EOFL Department, VFSTR (Deemed to be) University, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7839
Subject: Philosophy / Literature / Artificial Intelligence
Page No: 78–95
Received: Feb 16, 2025
Accepted: April 20, 2025
Published: July 01, 2025
Thematic Classification: Buddhist Philosophy, Scientific Inquiry, AI Ethics, Literary Analysis, Eastern Philosophy, Technological Intersections in Literature.
Abstract
The discourse surrounding creativity, authorship, and human interpretation has sparked intense ethical debates due to the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence in literature. With AI tools increasingly permeating literary analysis and creative writing, issues of bias, emotional depth, and ethical governance come sharply into focus. The paper offers a broader bibliographical cogitation around the convergence of Buddhist philosophy, scientific inquiry, and AI ethics in literature. It proposes that Buddhist tenets of mindfulness, wisdom, and ethical conduct can provide a transcendental scaffolding for efficaciously critiquing the issues at hand. By drawing on Buddhist epistemology, this work shows how scientific inquiry and AI ethics can benefit from mindful decision-making and the ethical governance of AIs. It investigates the role of Buddhist thought in the responsible development of AI, specifically regarding compassionate technology in all forms. This paper also reads Ruskin Bond in light of his narrative strategies, his meditative storytelling style, and his deep ecological awareness to understand how an emphasis on mindfulness and simplicity resonates within him. A question arises: can AI, in its ability to replicate meditation, recapture the mindfulness embedded in human literary expression? Interspersing literature, philosophy, and AI ethics, this study shows that Buddhist ethical tenets furnish a guiding framework for AI governance in humanities research. Indeed, it stresses the need for an interdisciplinary approach to perpetuate AI as an augmentation rather than substitution. Ultimately, this paper promotes a balanced partnership between AI and humankind that respects the internal cultural, ethical, and intellectual NSA of literary traditions.
Keywords: AI Ethics, Buddhist Philosophy, Digital Humanities, Literary Criticism, Mindfulness, Narrative Techniques, Ruskin Bond
Impact Statement
The research paper titled “Buddhist Philosophy, Scientific Inquiry, and the Ethics of AI in Literature” provides a timely and interdisciplinary exploration into how ancient philosophical traditions, particularly Buddhist thought, can inform contemporary debates around artificial intelligence (AI), its ethical use, and its portrayal in literature. By bridging Eastern philosophical tenets such as mindfulness, non-attachment, interdependence, and compassion with modern scientific and technological discourse, this study offers a fresh moral framework for evaluating AI’s evolving role in society.
The paper significantly contributes to both the humanities and emerging AI ethics by challenging purely utilitarian or Western-centric models of reasoning. It promotes a more holistic, empathetic, and ecologically attuned ethical model rooted in the middle way of Buddhist philosophy. Furthermore, its literary analysis deepens our understanding of how narratives across cultures have grappled with questions of consciousness, agency, and moral responsibility—issues now central to AI development.
In an era increasingly shaped by intelligent machines and data-driven systems, this research fosters cross-cultural dialogue and urges a reevaluation of the values underpinning technological progress. Its interdisciplinary methodology provides a robust template for future studies that seek to integrate philosophical depth, ethical foresight, and literary imagination into the discourse on responsible AI.
About Author
Mrs. B. Padma Sree is currently serving as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Science and Humanities. She holds a Master’s degree in English Literature and an M.Phil. Her academic and research interests lie prominently in literary analysis, narrative studies, and gender discourse in literature. In 2023, she presented a paper titled “Science and Humanities and Narrative Craftsmanship in Ruskin Bond’s Prose” at the International Conference on Advances in English Language Studies (ICAELS), organized by UEM, Jaipur, which is currently under processing for publication. Another significant contribution made by her in 2023 was the paper titled “The Voiceless Characters in the Selected Works of Ruskin Bond”, published in the RASTEMS Conference Proceedings (Paper ID: RASTEMS-20223-A02, ISBN: 978-81-966001-4-3, Page 48). In 2022, she presented a powerful gender-focused paper, “Rebel Against Patriarchal Hegemony in Susanna’s Seven Husbands”, at ICAELS, UEM Jaipur. Her work reflects a strong engagement with Indian English literature, particularly focusing on the nuanced character portrayals and gender dynamics within the works of Ruskin Bond and other Indian authors.
Cite this Article
APA 7th Style
Bodi, P., & Raghu Ram, K. S. (2025). Buddhist philosophy, scientific inquiry, and the ethics of AI in literature. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(03), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7839
Chicago 17th Style
Bodi, Padmasri, and Koduru Sree Raghu Ram. “Buddhist Philosophy, Scientific Inquiry, and the Ethics of AI in Literature.” Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal 4, no. 3 (2025): 78–95. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7839.
MLA 9th Style
Bodi, Padmasri and Raghu Ram, Koduru Sree. “Buddhist Philosophy, Scientific Inquiry, and the Ethics of AI in Literature.” Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, 2025, pp. 78-95, https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7839.
Statements and Declarations
Peer-Review Method: This article underwent a double-blind peer-review process by two independent external experts in Philosophy, Literature, and Ethics of Technology to ensure the depth of the interdisciplinary comparative analysis.
Competing Interests: The authors (Padmasri Bodi and Koduru Sree Raghu Ram) declare that they have no financial or personal conflicts of interest that could have influenced the research, interpretation of texts, or the conclusions presented in this study.
Funding: This research was conducted as part of the authors’ professional and academic activities at Vasireddy Venkatadri Institute of Technology and VFSTR University. No specific external grants or commercial funding were received for this work.
Data Availability: The study is based on a qualitative analysis of Buddhist philosophical texts, scientific methodologies, and literary representations of Artificial Intelligence. All primary and secondary sources cited are available through public academic archives and institutional libraries.
Licence: Buddhist Philosophy, Scientific Inquiry, and the Ethics of AI in Literature © 2025 by Padmasri Bodi and Koduru Sree Raghu Ram is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. This work is published by the International Council for Education Research and Training (ICERT).
Ethics Approval: As this study is a theoretical and literary review and does not involve direct experimentation on human participants or animal subjects, it was deemed exempt from formal ethical review by the Institutional Research Committees of the authors’ respective affiliations.
References
Primary Sources (Ruskin Bond’s Works)
1. Bond, Ruskin. A Handful of Nuts. Penguin Books, 1998.
2. Bond, Ruskin. The Sensualist. Penguin Books, 2001.
3. Bond, Ruskin. Susanna’s Seven Husbands. Penguin Books, 2011.
4. Bond, Ruskin. The Blue Umbrella. Rupa Publications, 1974.
5. Bond, Ruskin. Delhi Is Not Far. Penguin Books, 1994.
6. Bond, Ruskin. The Room on the Roof. Penguin Books, 1956.
Secondary Sources on Ruskin Bond and Indian English Literature
7.Mehrotra, Arvind Krishna. A History of Indian Literature in English. Columbia University Press, 2003.
8 Chandra, N.D.R. Contemporary Indian Writing in English: Critical Perceptions. Sarup & Sons, 2005
9. Sharma, Ruchi. Ruskin Bond: A Critical Evaluation. K.K. Publications, 2009
10. Khorana, Meena. The Life and Works of Ruskin Bond. Praeger, 2003.
11. Rahula, Walpola. What the Buddha Taught. Grove Press, 1959.
12. Harvey, Peter. An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
13. Gethin, Rupert. The Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford University Press, 1998.
14. Kalupahana, David J. A History of Buddhist Philosophy: Continuities and Discontinuities. University of Hawaii Press, 1992.
15. Floridi, Luciano. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press, 2020.
16. Bostrom, Nick, and Eliezer Yudkowsky. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
17. Hutson, Matthew. “Artificial Intelligence and the Challenge of Artistic Creativity.” Science, vol. 365, no. 6456, 2019, pp. 432-434.
18. Underwood, Ted. Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change. University of Chicago Press, 2019.
19. Jockers, Matthew L. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. University of Illinois Press, 2013
20. Piper, Andrew. Enumerations: Data and Literary Study. University of Chicago Press, 2018
21. Rockwell, Geoffrey, and Stéfan Sinclair. Hermeneutica: Computer-Assisted Interpretation in the Humanities. MIT Press, 2016
22. Elson, David K., et al. “Extracting Social Networks from Literary Fiction.” Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010, pp. 138–147.
23. Kumar, S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Learning and Creativity. Eduphoria, 01(01), 13–14. https://doi.org/10.59231/eduphoria/230402
24. Kumar, S., & Simran. (2024). Equity in K-12 STEAM education. Eduphoria, 02(03), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.59231/eduphoria/230412