Helen of Troy: Tracing the Shift from a Speculative Figure of Antiquity to Mythical Archetype
Kumar, Ravinder1 and Tomar, Parnit2
1Professor, Dept. of English, C.C.S. University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2Asst. Professor, Dept. of English, G.V.N Degree College, Ramala, Baghpat, U.P
Abstract
Helen of Troy, famously immortalized as “the face that launched a thousand ships,” sits at the threshold between history and myth, straddling fact and cultural imagination. While there may have been a real woman at the heart of the ancient narratives, Helen has become far more than a historical figure. Through centuries of retellings by poets, playwrights, and philosophers, Helen is transformed into a mythic archetype — a symbol of beauty, desire, conflict, and feminine agency. This paper explores the processes by which Helen becomes a myth: through symbolic elevation, narrative multiplicity, cultural function, and her distance from history. Drawing on theories of mythology, archetypes, and feminist literary analysis, this study reveals how Helen’s identity is constructed, deconstructed, and reimagined over time, reflecting evolving social values and gender politics. Her presence in works from Homer to Euripides and beyond shows how narrative layers accumulate to both glorify and scrutinize her image, turning her into a mirror for society’s conflicting ideals about womanhood. In this way, Helen’s story serves as a powerful example of how mythic figures are not fixed relics of the past but living symbols that adapt to cultural shifts, embodying the tensions between freedom and constraint, agency and objectification. Contemporary retellings like Margaret George’s Helen of Troy push this dynamic further by giving Helen her own narrative voice, imagining her thoughts, doubts, and choices, and reclaiming her as a speaking subject rather than a mute emblem of blame or desire. Such modern interpretations invite readers to reconsider the myth not as a static tale of ancient betrayal but as an enduring conversation about identity, memory, and the power of storytelling itself.
Keywords: Archetype, Mythologies, Narrative Multiplicity, Ideologies, Agency, Constructed Identity
Impact Statement
This paper reimagines Helen of Troy not as a distant mythic figure trapped in the past, but as a living, evolving symbol shaped by centuries of cultural retellings. By examining how Helen’s image has been stretched, challenged, and rewritten—from Homer and Euripides to Margaret George—this study shows how myth adapts to reflect shifting ideas about gender, agency, and identity. Rather than seeing Helen solely as a beautiful woman blamed for war, the paper uncovers how generations of narratives have transformed her into a powerful cultural mirror, reflecting the fears, desires, and ideologies of different societies. Drawing on literary theory, mythology, and feminist analysis, the study highlights how these retellings do more than preserve her story—they redefine it. Helen’s journey from voiceless object to introspective narrator mirrors the broader struggle for female agency in both literature and society. In revisiting how authors and storytellers have interpreted Helen over time, the paper raises important questions about who controls cultural memory and how that power shapes our understanding of women. By focusing on how Helen has been remembered, reimagined, and repurposed across time, this paper emphasizes that mythology is not a fixed inheritance but a dynamic conversation. Helen’s evolving portrayal—caught between archetype and individual—demonstrates how myth can be both a tool of oppression and a space for reclamation. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader work of retrieving women’s voices from the margins, offering a framework for rethinking how legendary figures are used to reinforce or resist cultural norms about beauty, blame, and power.
About Author
Primary Author
Parnit Tomar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of English at G.V.N. Degree College, Ramala (affiliated to CCS University, Meerut), and an emerging scholar With a strong academic foundation—including a B.A. (Hons.) in English from the University of Delhi and an M.A. from C.C.S University—she is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in English Literature. Her teaching experience spans both undergraduate and non-collegiate programs, having previously served as a guest lecturer at JDMC (University of Delhi, NCWEB).Her primary research interests lie in gender studies and postcolonial narratives. She has authored multiple scholarly papers in reputed UGC Care and peer-reviewed journals, including works on Toni Morrison’s Beloved, gender roles in That Long Silence, and intersections of age and identity in Funny Boy. Her research reflects a deep engagement with themes of interpellation, liminality, class conflict, and female agency.
Corresponding Author
Dr. Ravindra Kumar is a distinguished Professor of English at CCS University, Meerut, with over two decades of teaching and research experience. A specialist in American fiction and Indian writing in English, he holds a Ph.D. focused on race relations in William Faulkner’s work. He has authored over 40 research articles in reputed national and international journals and contributed chapters to academic anthologies. Dr. Kumar has supervised 15 Ph.D. and 90 M.Phil. scholars and is currently leading a funded research project on enhancing English communication skills for employability. He has presented papers at numerous national and international conferences, including in Egypt, and has delivered expert lectures across various institutions. His editorial contributions include co-authoring Poetry Down the Ages, published by Macmillan. A recipient of a Letter of Appreciation from CCS University for his contribution to higher education, he continues to play an active role in academic leadership and curriculum development.
References
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Euripides, (1998). Helen. In J. Morwood (Ed.), Translated by E.P (pp. 119–119). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00185905.coleridge, revised by Helene Emeriaud, Claudia Filos, Janet M. Ozsolak, Sarah Scott, and Jack Vaughan, The Helen Heroization Team, Kosmos Society, Center for Hellenic Studies, Harvard University
C, S., & B, M. (2024). Classifying Student Performance: An In-Depth analysis using Machine learning algorithms. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 03(04), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7751
Homer, & the Iliad. (1998) R. Fagles (Translated by). Penguin Classics.
Homer, & The Iliad of Homer. (September 2006) A. Pope (Translated by), notes by Rev. Theodore Alois Buckley, illustrated by John Flaxman. Project Gutenberg.
Jung, C. (1981). The archetypes and the collective unconscious R. F. C. Hull (Translated by). Princeton University Press.
Sharma, G., & Kumar, R. (2024). English Language Teaching (ELT): Analysing Strategies and Challenges from the Indian Perspective. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 03(04), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7759
Levi Strauss, & Claude. (1963). Structural anthropology C. Jacobson & B. G. Schoepf (Translated by), 2. Basic Books.
Marlowe, C., & Faustus, D. (Eds.). (1968). John Barry Steane, Penguin Classics. Penguin Books.